Navigation menu Personal tools Create account Log in. Namespaces Page Discussion. Views Read View source View history. Need Help Contact us About Wiki. GIS Online help. In other languages. Add Links. This page was last modified on 28 November , at This page has been accessed 19, times. It is not just a company, but it is the ultimate powerhouse of various software put together that is used in numerous fields and areas of interest. Every software that the company develops has some of the other unique features that distinguish the software from each other.
It has been selling its products as three main collections for specific needs. Start Your Free Design Course. While the users can also buy single products, this collection method has made Autodesk a winner amongst the audiences, as they can choose their desired collection and the products within it.
Since It has vast numbers of software developed by them and each one has its own specific role to play, there is no confusion, and rather the workings of the users become easier and simpler with these applications.
Moreover, the company creates educational versions of its products that are available free of cost to students and faculty through the Autodesk Education Community and by donations to NGOs through the TechSoup Global Organization.
This division of software to three main collections developed by the company has made the working straightforward and hassle-free. This collection is used for Building design, Infrastructure Design, and Construction. The user gets to access the best of tools and functions that enhance their productivity and capability for the best and realistic outputs.
This collection is specifically used for Product design, manufacturing, and factory layout. It also includes the new cloud-based application that is Fusion The users get to design and make projects and presentations with the best of products like the Inventor, 5-axis CAM, nesting, and factory layout. The full customized toolset of AutoCAD is also available. This collection has Maya, 3ds Max, Arnold, and more, to name a few applications. The company offers AutoCAD Civil 3D, a surveying, design, analysis, and documentation solution for civil engineering, including land development, transportation, and environmental projects; BIM , a construction management cloud-based software; AutoCAD, a software for professional design, drafting, detailing, and visualization; AutoCAD LT, a drafting and detailing software; computer-aided manufacturing CAM software for computer numeric control machining, inspection, and modelling for manufacturing; Fusion , a 3D CAD, CAM, and computer-aided engineering tool; and Industry Collections tools for professionals in architecture, engineering and construction, product design and manufacturing, and media and entertainment collection industries.
In addition, the company offers PlanGrid, a cloud-based field collaboration software, which provides general contractors, subcontractors, owners, and architects access to construction information in real-time; Revit software for building information modeling; and BuildingConnected, a bid-management solution. The company was founded in and is headquartered in San Rafael, California. Yahoo Finance.
Sign in. Sign in to view your mail. Finance Home. AI Now and Whittaker declined to comment for this story, but an AI Now spokesperson said Whittaker will remain involved with the organization. Richardson and the OSTP did not respond to request to comment. As the administration attempts to keep regulatory pace with a rapidly advancing AI tech industry, it's a little too early to know whether Whittaker and Richardson's policy goals will sync with those of their respective agencies.
However, with Whittaker filling an entirely new seat and Richardson working under a director at OSTP whose position has for the first time been elevated to the Cabinet level , their voices could carry. For one thing, Whittaker's work could bolster the FTC's efforts to intertwine data privacy and antitrust considerations in cases against tech firms. Whittaker has argued that AI advancements have been largely facilitated by a few dominant tech giants that have the resources to suck up massive amounts of data and spin it into algorithmic systems because of ad-driven business models, a common refrain of FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan.
Whittaker told lawmakers at a U. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology hearing in that the massive amounts of data and vast computational resources fueling the AI boom "are assets that only a handful of major tech companies have, and very few others do. Whittaker and Richardson's work at AI Now proposing policies for regulating algorithmic systems — from commercial voice and facial recognition tech to automated Medicaid benefit allocation tools — offers some big clues for what they might want to push at their respective agencies.
In general, they have suggested specific steps they'd like to see implemented by the government that could force more transparency around AI, something many lawmakers demand from big tech firms like Facebook, Google, Amazon and Twitter, as well as smaller companies.
In testimonies given at separate congressional hearings addressing AI, Whittaker and Richardson called for tech firms to waive trade secrecy claims that block government entities and the public from accessing information about their systems. They also wanted lawmakers to require that companies disclose the names and vendors of AI they use to make decisions that affect people. At the center of the AI Now proposals highlighted by both Whittaker and Richardson is the algorithmic impact assessment , a framework for evaluating the effects of algorithmic and AI systems.
It's a concept that has its foundation in more widely used environmental, human rights and privacy impact assessments. The group spotlighted algorithmic impact assessments in comments on "Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century" submitted to the FTC in , noting the evaluation process would "provide essential information for FTC investigations into potential deception, unfair business practices, or other violations of consumer rights.
VanDruff said we may see Whittaker's influence manifest if she weighs in on new or updated FTC rules or in a case against a company. Even before Khan was named chair, the commission had begun taking a more aggressive stance on algorithmic technologies.
In separate cases, it forced photo app Everalbum and Cambridge Analytica to destroy data garnered through allegedly deceptive means as well as the algorithms built from that data. The agency in April reminded observers of its consumer-protection work in the AI arena, including issuing guidance for businesses using automated decision systems to determine credit scoring or home-loan decisions.
Fresh off a blockbuster IPO that saw his expense management company's value soar by a billion dollars, Expensify CEO David Barrett said small businesses are the core focus. Benjamin Pimentel benpimentel covers fintech from San Francisco. He can be reached at bpimentel protocol. For CEO and founder David Barrett, the successful debut capped a hectic week which had him performing a task he hasn't had to do in a long time: wooing investors for the company he founded 13 years ago.
We haven't raised money in like, six years or something. So we don't really talk to new investors, or at least haven't in a very long time. But the novel task gave Barrett an opportunity to explain the company's main focus: the small and medium-sized business market. Investors don't always get it, he said. That's cute and all. But when are you going to start thinking about the real enterprise?
Expensify does offer its expense management tools to big corporations, but the Portland, Oregon-based company sees SMBs as its core market. Barrett explained why in an interview with Protocol.
He also talked about Expensify's game plan, his views of the expense management software market and how the company has adapted to the pandemic. Barrett, who became famous for scathing criticisms of the Trump administration , also shared his views on President Biden's performance. It's pretty hectic basically talking to every hedge fund and investor in the world in the past week or so. We're kind of out of practice, honestly.
We don't really raise money. It's been fun to get back out there and talk with people and share the vision and hear people like, "Wow, you guys have been busy. I don't know if there's a particularly hard question to answer after you've answered the same questions 50 times in a row.
Maybe one of the most persistent questions — though we didn't get this as much as I expected — more often than not, people are like, "OK, so you're this payments super app in SMB. What makes Expensify special, fundamentally, is that we have a completely different business model.
Everyone else in our industry has a top-down acquisition model. They've got a sales team calling into the CFO or whatever. And that model works fine, but it only works in a tiny corner of the marketplace and it's the same market that everyone else was going after. Our competition is email and Excel. It's like a manila envelope stuffed full of receipts that is the actual competition.
And no one is defending it. Our competitors use the same business model. You buy a list of CFOs and then you call that list from top to bottom and then you put them through a qualification [process]. They're all calling the same people off the same list with the same message, selling the same product. And, shocker, it's really hard to compete when you're exactly the same as everyone else. Our approach is starting with the employee, and then they pull us into the company.
The bulk of our revenue is subscription revenue that comes from companies between, let's say, 10 and employees. There's a view that B2C fintech has become increasingly hard, and a B2B approach is more cost-effective.
I love that everyone thinks that because that's why they're all failing while we thrive. If you try to apply an enterprise business model in the SMB, those are really different markets. The economics of top-down acquisition just do not scale well outside of the mid-market.
I gotta go acquire it. We need to go to bigger businesses. We're different. We're like, "Screw the enterprise. We will be your very first accounting tool because way before you have revenue, you definitely have expenses.
Then we'll grow with you forever. Business travel is back, which is great. We see a different slice of business travel than I think most because we're more of a Main Street business than a Wall Street business. When people think of business travel, they typically think George Clooney in "Up in the Air," sort of flying around.
And that happens. It's obviously a big deal. But there is a huge fraction of business travel which is just mileage, people driving around. My dad drove around all of Michigan essentially selling machine tools. You drive to Toledo and you stop by the Home Depot and you pick up a whole bunch of materials for the job or something like that.
We get way more reimbursements for Home Depot than for United. Business travel is a very humble affair for a huge fraction of our customers. How do you view the market environment going forward, given that we're still in a pandemic? The pandemic was basically the ultimate stress test of our business model. I think we've weathered it pretty fine. Going forward, so long as we don't have an even worse pandemic, I think we're gonna be just fine.
I'm actually quite optimistic, and I think that our customers are as well. I think we feel we're through the worst of it. I think there's a ton of reasons to be super optimistic, honestly. And I think that that's why we're excited about it. You were very critical of the previous administration.
What do you think of the job President Biden is doing? Is there anything that the new administration has done that you are critical of? I think the vaccine mandates are some really hard calls. I can see value in both perspectives. Obviously the vaccines work and they're wonderful, but at the same time, I think your body is your ultimate line of sanctity. These are really hard issues.
0コメント