Atlantech Online offers data center and colocation services to businesses of all sizes. If you would like to see how Atlantech can provide the right solution for your needs, click here to schedule a consultation. Get a Quote. Book a Meeting. Blog Home. Virtual Servers vs. Physical Servers: Which Is Best? Depending on your needs, the server may be located onsite or in a conveniently-located colocation facility. Your IT staff can fully customize and configure the server to your specifications and business requirements.
Cons of Physical Servers: Relatively high cost of server purchase, maintenance, and in the case of hardware failure, replacement. Your IT staff will be responsible for setup, configuration, and maintenance on a continual basis.
You may need to hire a contractor or vendor for help if you have difficulty with configuration or repairs. Users cannot scale storage in small increments once you reach the maximum workload, since you purchase and own the hardware.
Requires physical or colocation space. The Pros and Cons of Virtual Servers Virtualization typically occurs in the cloud or on servers that are owned, maintained, and located offsite. Pros of Virtual Servers : Fewer upfront costs, since you are not required to purchase hardware.
Potential for lower lifetime costs on configuration and maintenance. Access to expert assistance on setup, configuration, maintenance, and software licenses. Reduced need for in-house IT talent. Potential to consolidate servers and increase workload efficiency. Reduced environmental footprint, due to shared workloads. Cons of Virtual Servers: Potential for higher recurring monthly costs, as opposed to higher upfront investment. It doesn't get much simpler than that. Of course, it also doesn't get much more fragile than that.
One bad system board or RAID card and you're out of business. So, good and bad. But the problem is that once you start down the slope of changing things, every IT person is going to want you to grind their own personal axe. This one wants you to use separate VMs for each role.
Another will pick at your RAID choice. Yet another will urge you to adopt instead of anything else. Use REFS. Use DFS. Use whatever until your head explodes.
DO this. Virtualization makes some tasks easier. Virtualization makes some tasks harder. Virtualization puts another layer of management between you and the OS. That indisputably increases your workload.
Virtualization makes formerly impossible tasks merely difficult - and so tempts you to take them on, further increasing your workload. Still, I recommend it because the advantages in business continuity and availability are cheaply bought for a little extra management time.
Everything else can stay on the host. That's how we deployed several remote server machines trough different locations in Texas. We had local administrators who would administer the local machine but not have access to the virtualized DC.
That was under our control from headquarters. The Dannon Project is an IT service provider. Yes, everything should be virtualized unless you have a business reason or technical reason to not do so. Point blank.
But that's a minor point. I agree you probably could keep the file share on the DC as that's not a performance hit to it. Stop confusing yourself.
Even if you had one server or a hundred servers physical it's usually the best practice to virtualize first. Yes, there are situations where maybe you shouldn't. But you're not in that group.
Play those situations by ear. Backing up is easy if you have a proper server, network or internet spot to drop off your data. That's before and when you virtualize. When you virtualize the Window's Backup becomes less important as the virtual machine is basically a flat file.
Robert But the problem is that once you start down the slope of changing things, every IT person is going to want you to grind their own personal axe. What Robert failed to mention with respect is that there is a reason to separate vm's by role. When you virtualize your servers, your entire business can benefit in more ways than one.
Maintaining hardware is not an enjoyable thing. It can be time-consuming and littered with question marks. But luckily for you, there are ways around all this tedious upkeep and those annoying repairs. When you virtualize your servers, you reduce your need for physical, on-site servers.
Because of this, it can be simple and effective to create a replication site. Most virtualization software also allows you to test disaster recovery failovers—a protocol that is almost impossible with a large number of physical servers. Is your company interested in learning more about server virtualization? Reach out to a Network Coverage expert today to discuss how virtualization can increase productivity and reduce technology costs in your company.
Server virtualization and Its Importance Server virtualization is hardly a new technology. What is Server Virtualization? Why is Server Virtualization Important? Minimize Costs Server virtualization minimizes costs by increasing the utilization of existing resources. Improved Disaster Recovery Server virtualization makes it easier to implement an effective disaster recovery plan.
0コメント